THAT
BOOMING ART MARKET
by David Shvartsman
Finance Trends Matter
May 16, 2006
The contemporary art market boom continues unabated, as a wave of
liquidity washes over the globe, lifting prices of assets and
collectibles along the way. Last week, as a series of contemporary art
auctions were set to hit New York, Barron's featured another article
by Suzanne McGee chronicling the rising tide of art prices that has
helped fuel some artists' rising stars.
How did the action unfold? Artnet
reports, "The day sale of contemporary art at Sotheby�s New
York on May 11, 2006, totaled $56,348,201, almost double the $23.8
million presale high estimate."
In fact, Sotheby's was not the only auction house that fared well in
recent days. Phillips capped off the week with a crowded contemporary
sale that collected $29.5 million dollars. High prices were also seen
at Christie's, where works by contemporary artists such as Mike Kelly
and Damien Hirst achieved noteworthy prices. According to the International
Herald Tribune, Christie's Tuesday evening sale of
"Post War and Contemporary Art" brought in $143 million
dollars.
Refco was able to get a small piece of financial relief, thanks to
their "long position" in one hot segment of the art market,
contemporary art photography. From Chinapost.com:
Refco Inc., the bankrupt futures trader, may have done better
collecting art than trading futures.
The cream of its corporate art-photography collection sold
Friday night for US$5.4 million at Christie's International Plc in New
York. A confluence of big-name photographers and a mania for
contemporary art provided a smidgen of relief for Refco's creditors,
who were owed more than US$16 billion as of October. The results more
than doubled the presale low estimate and bodes well for future
contemporary art auctions at Christie's and Sotheby's Holdings Inc. in
New York.
"It's a taste of things to come next week," said
Matthew Carey-Williams of the Gagosian Gallery.
Meanwhile, seasoned collectors and advisers were quietly
muttering about lunatic prices paid by naive collectors with more
money than sense.
The art craze is not limited to Western works or the appetites of
Western buyers. Russian buyers continue to emerge as a formidable
buying bloc, and interest
in Russian art has spurred organizers to try and build on Moscow's
reputation as an art capital. Interest in the art market has also
extended to Asia; Christie's will sponsor an upcoming Asian
contemporary art sale in Delhi later this month. Excitement over some
of the region's contemporary art was evident at recent New York sales.
As reported in a recent New
York Times article,
"Works by emerging Chinese
artists have recently received a lot of attention; in April Sotheby's
devoted most of an Asian art sale to them. Last night Phillips
included several works by some of these artists to see how they
measured up alongside their American and European colleagues. Their
performance was staggering."
Some observers expressed continued amazement over the appeal
surrounding currently in vogue artists such as Donald Judd, whose box
sculpture arrangements were a hit in Christie's contemporary sale last
Tuesday. Reviewing a catalogue description of the artist's work, International
Herald Tribune reporter Sourem Melikian noted that the
value of some works seem to hang precariously on current fashionable
interpretations of their meaning and importance.
Interestingly, some segments of the market continue to be ignored.
Following Christie's evening sale of Modern and Impressionist art, The
Jerusalem Post's Meir Ronnen remarked, "The lovely
late Gauguin flower piece, a true masterpiece, was knocked down at
$4m., even though Christie's had flashed an estimate of
$7m.-$10m." The writer also noted that although sales totals for
that evening's auction had approached 1990 highs, the equivelant value
may not have been approached due to the decline in the dollar since
that time.
While auction totals may not have surpassed their highs in terms of
real dollars, individual works from sought-after artists might be
doing the trick. Of course, it would be difficult to isolate how much
of the return from a sale price is a by product of inflation and how
much is a function of increased demand for a particular item. Market
observers and academics have often preferred to track artworks by
classification groups and judge performance of art indices or
constructed "portfolios" over various time periods. For a
past look at art's ability to perform as an inflation hedge and
investment class, please see "Art
as Investment, Inflation Hedge".
Will the booming art market continue to surprise observers and
sceptics alike? While currently favored contemporary artworks could
suffer from a dropoff similar to one that befell the Impressionist
market after 1990, prices for artworks in areas of relative value
might be kept aloft in an inflationary tide. As a continually
surprised onlooker, I think I'll leave it to hindsight and art experts
to figure this one out.
© 2006 David Shvartsman
Editorial Archive
Contact Information
David
Shvartsman
Finance Trends Matter
Chicago, IL USA
Email
| FinanceTrends
Blogspot