THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Part 5: The Club of Rome is Governed
by Three Complimentary Principles
by Douglas V. Gnazzo
January 9, 2007
[ Previous parts: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

Tommy Can You Hear Me - The Who

“Have I become your enemy because I tell you the truth?” [1]

Abstract

This week we are going to take a look at the Club of Rome – one of the world’s most elite groups. As with all things in life, there are various opinions regarding the Club. Some see it as a humanitarian organization created to solve the world’s problems. Others view it as a group of the world’s wealthiest and most elite collectivists, bent on forming a New World Order that favors themselves - the select elite, over and above the common man.

Most of the following information is taken directly from the Club of Rome’s website CLUB OF ROME. We will provide the information and let the reader decide for themselves the true nature of the beast. We will add comments along the way. All quoted information is footnoted. Most is from the above noted website.

Structure

The Club of Rome is a global think tank and center of innovation and initiative. As a non-profit, non governmental organization (NGO), it brings together scientists, economists, businessmen, international high civil servants, heads of state and former heads of state from all five continents who are convinced that the future of humankind is not determined once and for all and that each human being can contribute to the improvement of our societies. [2]

Comments

Aurellio Peccei is considered to be the founding member of the Club. Formal public recognition of the organization began in 1968. The following list of individual members sheds some light on the internal nature and composition of the group.

• The Hon. Richard von Weizsacker - Former President of Germany

• H.M. Dona Sophia - Queen of Spain

• H.M. Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands

• HRH Prince Philippe of Belgium

• H.M. Juan Carlos I King of Spain

• The Hon. Mikhail Gorbachev - Former President of the USSR

• Mr. Albert Sasson - Special Adviser to the UNESCO Director General

• H.R.H. Prince El Hassan bin Talal - Presiding President of the Club of Rome 

• Mr. Esko Kalimo - Former Director Research Institute of the Finland Social Security; Professor for Social Welfare; Vice Chair of FICOR

• Mr. Raoul Weiler - Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences

• Ms. Mervat Tallawy - Executive Secretary of the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA)

• Ms. Astrid Stuckelberger - Adjunct Professor Department of Social & Community Health Facility of Medicine, University of Geneva [3]

Club of Rome’s Mission Statement

The Club of Rome’s essential mission is to act as an independent, global, non official catalyst of change. Thus it aims at the following:

The identification of the most crucial problems facing humanity, their analysis in the global context of the world-wide problematique, the research of future alternative solutions and the elaboration of scenarios for the future.

The communication of such problems to the most important public and private decision-makers as well as to the general public.

The Club of Rome is governed by three complementary principles:

1. A global perspective in examining issues with the awareness that the increasing interdependence of nations and the globalization of problems pose predicaments beyond the capacity of individual countries.

2. Holistic thinking and the seeking of a deeper understanding of complexity within the contemporary problems – political, social, economic, technological, environmental, psychological and cultural – which the Club of Rome terms‚ the world problematique.

3. An interdisciplinary and long-term perspective focusing on the choices and policies determining the destiny of future generations, because this perspective is too often neglected by governments and other decision-makers on account of short term interests.[4]

Comments on Mission Statement

From the above quote we learn that the Club seeks global change. This is an important distinction to remember. The change that is sought after is the solution of the world’s most crucial problems – no small undertaking to say the least. Their goal is to drastically change the world by solving all of its problems.

Obviously, if a group considers themselves able to solve the world’s problems, it follows that they must view themselves as a select group of elite individuals with extraordinary capabilities, resources, and powers – able to wrought a perfect world from what they view as an imperfect conglomeration of diverse common peoples unable to tow the line – at least in regards to their (Club of Rome’s) view of what towing the line is and isn’t.

Another important distinction of the group’s belief structure now shows itself: a line straight through humanity has been drawn that distinguishes between two diametrically opposed groups: those that have, and those that have not: those that can and those that cannot.

Same Old

It’s the one of the oldest stories of mankind that pits one segment of the population that cannot deal with the level of sophistication of the world’s problems – against those who think they can: the common man against the elite - the many versus the few. In the time of the ancients it was the temple priests that held the power, by the possession of “sacred” knowledge others did not have. Predict an eclipse or a draught in past ages and you would be likened and worshipped as a god.

In today’s modern world it is still the temple priests wielding the sword of Damocles – but today’s temple is the Federal Reserve, surrounded by the other less powerful central banks of the world. The priests are now the wizards of structured finance whose potions of derivatives and spells of mortgaged backed securities charm and delude the populace into hapless obedience - accepting the unacceptable: a life sentence that condemns the common working man to a life of debt servitude to the elite money changers – enforced by their henchmen, under guise as the body politic, with its paid for intelligentsia. A show that would have Barnum & Bailey muttering the famous line: there’s a sucker born every minute and two to catch him.

As can be seen, the word global keeps popping up repeatedly in their writings. The Club’s signature trait is that everything is considered on a global scale, encompassing the entire world and all of humanity. They see an ever increasing interdependence of nations unable to cope with global problems that are perceived to be out of the reach of the capabilities of the individual nations to properly deal with – let alone mere individual mortals.

Only a superman – a superior human being of the elite echelon, can possibly comprehend such complicated subjects; and then devise a plan to successfully deal with them.

This set of global problems and the common man’s inability to deal with them they refer to as the world problematique.

Le Problematique

World Problematique is a concept created by the Club of Rome to describe the set of crucial problems – political, social, economic, technological, environmental, psychological and cultural - facing humanity.

The complexity of the world problematique lies in the high level of mutual interdependence of all these problems on the one hand, and in the long time it often takes until the impact of action and reaction in this complex system becomes visible.

The overwhelming growth in world population caused by the positive birth-rate loop is a recent phenomenon, a result of mankind's very successful reduction of worldwide mortality.

The controlling negative feedback loop has been weakened, allowing the positive loop to operate virtually without constraint.

There are only two ways to restore the resulting imbalance.

Either the birth rate must be brought down to equal the new, lower death rate, or the death rate must rise again.

All of the "natural" constraints to population growth operate in the second way--they raise the death rate. Any society wishing to avoid that result must take deliberate action to control the positive feedback loop--to reduce the birth rate.

But stabilizing population alone is not sufficient to prevent overshoot and collapse; a similar run with constant capital and rising population shows that stabilizing capital alone is also not sufficient.

What happens if we bring both positive feedback loops under control simultaneously? We can stabilize the capital stock in the model by requiring that the investment rate equal the depreciation rate, with an additional model link exactly analogous to the population-stabilizing one.

If we relax our most unrealistic assumption--that we can suddenly and absolutely stabilize population and capital, replacing them with the following:

• The population has access to 100 percent effective birth control.
• The average desired family size is two children.
• The economic system endeavors to maintain average industrial output per capita at about the 1975 level. [5]

Comments on Le Problematique

First, I will simply say what I believe and am moved to say: some of the above is rather scary stuff – as elitist as it gets. Basically, it speaks of playing god - by determining birth, death, and equilibrium rates. It is complete control and domination of the people’s way of life. It is not natural or normal. It is excessive and delusional.

To believe that any group of individuals has the superior intelligence and forbearance – let alone the moral right – to determine what the birth and death rate of the human race should be is not only absurd and ludicrous – it’s downright sick, maniacal, and twisted; and can only have come from the depths of the abyss. It is cold – very cold – chillingly cold.

Delusion

All delusional thinking is based on incorrect beliefs and assumptions, often quite contradictory, yet the delusional mind does not perceive them as such; instead it believes what it wants to believe – what is HAS to believe, tricked by its own innate misperceptions of reality, driven by its personal inner demons that have not as of yet been conquered - thus gaining control over all thought processes and twisting and deforming them to the extent of making them delusional.

For example, take the following statement as quoted above:

“The overwhelming growth in world population caused by the positive birth-rate loop is a recent phenomenon, a result of mankind's very successful reduction of worldwide mortality. The controlling negative feedback loop has been weakened, allowing the positive loop to operate virtually without constraint.” [6]

On one hand it is stated that: “… a result of mankind’s very successful reduction of worldwide mortality” - which means that man has done a good thing in reducing the death rate, a fairly obvious and easy enough point to be understood and accepted by any normal, rational thinking person.

The very next sentence then states: “the controlling NEGATIVE feedback loop has been weakened, allowing the positive loop to operate virtually without constraint”. What is the negative feedback loop being referred to here? It is referring to the DEATH RATE.

So on the one hand it is good to reduce the death rate, but then it is stated in euphemistic prose that the negative feedback loop or DEATH RATE has been weakened and that such results in more human births, which is seen to be unwanted behavior needed to be expunged.

How can it be both good and bad to lower the death rate? It is one or the other, and the one that it is, in TRUTH - is that it is positive, not negative.

If it were negative, then increasing the death rate would be seen to be positive. This is the twisted sisters of fate spinning their web of deceit.

Playing God

Next it is said: “There are only two ways to restore the resulting imbalance. “either the birth rate must be brought down to equal the new, lower death rate, or the death rate must rise again.” [7]

Read that over a few times very slowly, and let it sink in – word by word. First, this is a pure example of unadulterated elitism, as it playing the role of god – determining the question of life and death. No man nor group of men have the RIGHT to determine the life or death of anyone, or anything, let alone of their fellow man on a global scale – in other words the entire human race.

It is then followed up by: “all of the ‘natural’ constraints to population growth operate in the second way--they raise the death rate. Any society wishing to avoid that result must take deliberate action to control the positive feedback loop--to reduce the birth rate.” [8]

It is stated that the NATURAL way of population constraint is to raise the death rate. This is misleading as it does not precisely define what is meant by the death rate. Obviously, as more people are born and inhabit the world – there will concurrently be more deaths because the total number of people making up the population has increased.

But what of the percentage of deaths to birth – is that what is meant by the death rate rising? Is there presently a higher percentage of deaths per births? I think not. However, it is a moot point insofar as to the moral and philosophical aspects of the issue – let alone to the ontological side of the issue.

Might not nature take care of its own? Is it not possible that the birth rate can slow down as well? And if death is part of life and is natural – then a rising death rate by natural means is what is supposed to be occurring - if it is occurring; if not – then it isn’t supposed to be, as it isn’t.

In other words: nothing happens by accident – nothing. If it is occurring it is supposed to be occurring – otherwise it would not be. It is what is it is until it isn’t – and then it is no more.

Meaning & Purpose

Where is there any discussion as to the meaning and purpose of life? How can one claim to know what the birth or death rate or equilibrium rate is - if they do not know what the purpose of life is to begin with? They know not from whence they speak – they know not.

The conclusion therefore, is as faulty as the delusional “reasoning” it is based on. Society does not have to limit the birth rate by any world wide controlled program to reinforce the positive feedback loop. It is all smoke and mirrors. But smoke and mirrors for what?

Perhaps the next sentence in the Club’s missive can expose some shadows for us to try to discern - by casting some light upon the hellacious waifs attempting to remain unknown.

“But stabilizing population alone is not sufficient to prevent overshoot and collapse; a similar run with constant capital and rising population shows that stabilizing capital alone is also not sufficient.” [9]

Ah, now we are getting down to the bone – capital or money and profit suddenly enter the picture. Now the monumental task of stabilizing population is not enough – now we need the stabilizing of capital as well.

Do you see where this is leading to: total control of not only the birth and deaths rates, but to have them completely aligned with capital investments rates that are equal to the depreciation rate.

THIS IS ABOUT NOTHING BUT PURE UNADULTERATED PROFIT
IT MAKES A MOCKERY OF HUMAN LIFE – REPLACING IT
WITH THE LIFE OF AN AUTOMATON - CONTROLLED BY ITS MASTERS

Here is where it is leading to:

Excess industrial capability is employed for producing consumption goods rather than increasing CSS industrial capital investment rate above the depreciation rate.

• The capital plant and the population are constant in size. The birth rate equals the death rate and the capital investment rate equals the depreciation rate.

• All input and output rates--birth, death, investment, and depreciation--are kept to a minimum.

• The levels of capital and population and the ratio of the two are set in accordance with the values of the society. They may be deliberately revised and slowly adjusted as the advance of technology creates new options. [10]

Comment

It is believed and stated that:

“An equilibrium state would not be free of pressures, since no society can be free of pressure. Equilibrium would require trading certain human freedoms, such as producing unlimited numbers of children or consuming uncontrolled amounts of resources, for other freedoms, such as relief from pollution and crowding and the threat of collapse of the world system.” [11]

You want to be a ruler of the universe, the above is the proposed blueprint, all in one neat little package. Welcome to the Brave New World – welcome to the New World Order.

Is this what YOU want? Is this what YOU want for your children and grandchildren? If not – stand up and be heard before it’s too late, before you can’t stand up – before you can’t be heard, before you can’t speak up without permission.

About the only thing this group study got right is “equilibrium would require trading certain human freedoms.”

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out, however, in the pursuit of full disclosure, I would suggest removing the word “certain” and replacing it with “many” if not “most” human freedoms, such as the right to be born.

Random Issues

The following are random issues/paragraphs taken from the Mission Statement of the Club of Rome. They are not being presented out of context, as the comments/paragraphs that follow are about major ideals of the Club, which permeate its writings. They are offered in this order because the discussion of the above ideas will help facilitate an easier understanding of the following issues.

Comments on the material presented is offered directly after certain paragraphs, as well as at the end of all of the quoted information.

Quote

As the 21st century approaches, there is a growing sense of uncertainty and anxiety. Faced by increasing complexity, dizzying globalization and a world subject to constant political, economic and social upheavals, human beings today are fearful. We appear to be in the early stages of the formation of a new type of world society.

Although until now these ideas have sometimes existed only in the imaginations of certain unusually inspired individuals, we need now to bring them together and make full use of them in our search for a better future for humanity.

So far, the efforts to promote the growing globalization have almost always been perceived in a negative light, as an unfortunate consequence of a crisis of civilization. [12]

Comment

It is postulated that “human beings are said to be fearful because of certain types of upheavals” – all of which have existed from the time of the ancients, and do not represent any new challenges to humanity – necessitating such centralized fascist control by the formation of a new type of global world society.

The reference to “certain unusually inspired individuals” is the epitome of elitism. Only the intellectually superior supermen have the capabilities of forming the “new type of world society.” My response is who died and left them King?

Lastly the flippant remark is made that the reason “growing globalization” has been “perceived in a negative light” is because it is the “consequence of a crisis of civilization.” A crisis of civilization - or a crisis of not enough profit for the select elect few?

Quote

In this transitional period, humanity is therefore facing a double challenge: having to grope its way towards an understanding of the new world with so many as yet hidden facets, and also, in the mists of uncertainty, to learn how to manage the new world and not be dominated by it.

The basis of the new order should be an understanding that human initiatives and institutions exist only to serve human needs.

From this standpoint, we shall then be able to visualize the sort of world we would like to live in; in order for this vision to be attainable and viable, we must evaluate the resources - human and moral and material - to forge this new global society. [13]

Comment

Notice the use of the words “new world”, “new order”, and “new global society” , which when taken in the fullness of the total quoted view – show that a New World Order on a global scale is indeed being proposed.

Quote

We strongly feel the need for a thorough overhaul of democracy, going far beyond its present organization and functioning, and also to devise a new economic system that avoids the shortcomings of the market economy. [14]

Comment

A through overhaul of democracy is said to be needed, as well as the development of a new economic system that avoids the shortcomings of the market economy. Needless to say that a complete overhaul of democracy is a bit radical and smacks of the foul stench of first class elitism to the point of racial superiority.

It would be interesting to see just what this new economic system is that is better then a market economy – unfortunately it is never fully explained, although it is strongly alluded to by the statement: “capital plant and the population are constant in size. The birth rate equals the death rate and the capital investment rate equals the depreciation rate.”

This would obviously not be a free market system but a fascist state or elite controlled system.

Quote

The essential mission of the Club of Rome is to act as an international, non-official catalyst of change. This role is prompted by the slowness and inadequacy of governments and their institutions to respond to urgent problems, constrained as they are by structures and policies designed for earlier, simpler times and by relatively short electoral cycles. [15]

Comment

Note the usage of the word: “non-official”, as well as the “slowness and inadequacy of governments to respond to urgent problems”. By themselves the two quoted phases have one meaning, but when taken together they acquire a more distinct and specific meaning: the non-official viewpoint is making the distinction between the “slowness and inadequacy of governments to respond in to urgent problems”, constrained as they are by red tape and bureaucracy.

In other words – the existing national governments are not capable of solving the world’s problems. Instead, a new elite one world government is needed to be able to properly deal with the complexity of the supposed world crisis - one that transcends nationalism.

The following quote sums up the mindset behind the veil of illusion and delusion:

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." [16]

Summary Conclusion

The Club of Rome is very forward and public in the dissemination of its policies and ideas. They make no attempt of remaining secretly out of the public’s eye, as most elite groups do. This is a show of what they consider to be their strength and power, which in their eyes, raises them above the common man’s ability to question or seriously challenge the Club’s positions on the various issues for global change.

After all, their membership is about as elite as it gets, with the only missing power brokers being the crème de la crème of the international banking and financial community – who always remain lurking in the shadows, shrouded in darkness. The creatures who do not come out into the light of day. Some refer to them as the old world/new world merchants of death.

They are also not reticent in stating that a New World Order and One World Government is the needed salvation of the human race. A One World System that drastically overhauls democracy and establishes a new economy that is beyond the short comings of the present free market system.

Welcome to complete control of individual human rights - birth and death rates, versus capital investment rates that equal depreciation rates. A recipe born in hell, conceived in sin and nurtured at the coldest altar known to man.

Welcome to global totalitarianism – to corporate fascism – to the end of individual freedom and liberty – welcome to the New World Order - of slavery, 21^st century style.

What’s Missing

What stands out by its total absence is the complete disregard of any sort of ontological and philosophical discussion of the purpose of life, society, and the human race. There is no mention of epistemology or spirituality – nothing but hard cold facts of PHYSICAL EXISTENCE TO PERPETUATE EXISTENCE.

No attempt is made to understand life – only to CONTROL IT – TO DOMINATE IT.

Rather than offering a means of progressing towards a spiritual goal and purpose for living life in harmony with our inner being and with nature – what is offered is the mere perpetuation of our outer physical existence. An existence that is in the control of the elite few for what amounts to their own personal benefit and profit, at the sake and cost of all individual rights, freedoms and liberties.

It is nothing but a quality control system of ALL resources by elite fascism.

No consideration is given to the possibility of a higher power and order to the universe – an order that is so self-evident all around us that it inspired Einstein to remark on its expression in all of life. The miracle of birth alone, whereby a human being, in all its complexity and fullness is created - stands as a testament to a higher power, purpose and design.

Why?

It is that power, purpose and design that should be the basis and grounding for any form of government and society – such that the universe can fulfill its purpose as being the university (school) within which we move and live and have our being – to fulfill our purpose and progression as individuals of spiritual consciousness, not limited by our physical bodies and manifestations thereof.

Thus ends this the fifth paper in the series of the New World Order. Next week we will offer part sixth of the series.

“For When The Perfect Comes - The Imperfect Shall Cease To Be
And Night Will Be No More” [17]

The Georgia Guidestones
[picture at top of article]

On one of the highest hilltops in Elberton County, Georgia stands a huge granite monument. Engraved in eight different languages on the four giant stones that support the common capstone are 10 Guides, or commandments. That monument is alternately referred to as The Georgia Guidestones, or the American Stonehenge. Though relatively unknown to most people, it is an important link to the Occult Hierarchy that dominates the world in which we live. It makes many “recommendations” for saving the Earth. One such is:

Limiting the population of the earth to 500 million will require the extermination of nine-tenths of the world's people. The American Stonehenge's reference to establishing a world court foreshadows the current move to create an International Criminal Court and a world government.

References

[1] Apostle Paul, Galatians 4:16
[2] CLUB OF ROME

[3] same as above
[4] same as above
[5] same
[6] same
[8] same
[9] same
[10] same
[11] same
[12] same
[13] same
[14] same
[15] same
[16] Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider – co-founder and secretary, respectively, of the Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp. 104-105
[17] Revelations - Bible
Limits to Growth The Limits to Growth: A Report to The Club of Rome (1972), by Donella H. Meadows, Dennis l. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, William W. Behrens III

CONTACT INFORMATION
Douglas V. Gnazzo
Honest Money Gold & Silver Report, LLC
Canton Center, CT USA
Email  |  Website

About the author: Douglas V. Gnazzo is CEO of New England Renovation LLC, a historical restoration contractor that specializes in restoring older buildings that are vintage historic landmarks. He writes for numerous websites and his work appears both here and abroad. Just recently he was honored by being chosen as a Foundation Scholar for the Foundation for the Advancement of Monetary Education (FAME).

Disclaimer: The contents of this article represent the opinions of Douglas V. Gnazzo. Nothing contained herein is intended as investment advice or recommendations for specific investment decisions, and you should not rely on it as such. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not a registered investment advisor. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and using methods believed to be reliable, but Douglas. V. Gnazzo cannot accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of your reliance on this analysis and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Individuals should consult with their broker and personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities. Do your own due diligence regarding personal investment decisions. This article may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by law. The purpose of this article is intended to be used as an educational discussion of the issues involved. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not a lawyer or a legal scholar. Information and analysis derived from the quoted sources are believed to be reliable and are offered in good faith. Only a highly trained and certified and registered legal professional should be regarded as an authority on the issues involved; and all those seeking such an authoritative opinion should do their own due diligence and seek out the advice of a legal professional. Lastly Douglas V. Gnazzo believes that The United States of America is the greatest country on Earth, but that it can yet become greater. This article is written to help facilitate that greater becoming. God Bless America.